Role of Modern Alternative Digital Tools in Education: Impacts on Educational Leadership
Keywords:
Technological Leadership, Digital Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Future of EducationAbstract
At the start of the twenty-first centenary, latest teaching technologies established for effective communication and implementation of new strategies according to technology. Instructive technologies are of any type of tools or assets that help in classroom directions. These tools can be computers, electronic equipment’s, printers, scanners and some more teaching tools used to support learning process. Other Assets that may be used in classroom are supply of electricity, facility of internet and teaching program in soft form like software’s. Recent technologies attracted the attentiveness of educational leaders being they exposed pupil to their technological influences learning procedure and approach. Applying latest technology in present day schoolrooms is a dare for educational leaders because students as well as teachers have less understanding about this all. Educational leaders are more involved in their role as technology leader’s deep involvement for the application of technology in the schoolrooms. Educational leadership the use the technology for managerial motive knows very well the importance of technology use in educational field. Deep engagement involves specific technological leadership implementation which give ability, help and assets to teachers in the area of application. Teachers have implemented unique teaching skills in the form of modern technology which have come into for participatory digital leadership which gives professionals evolution and reform of already present teaching exercises. Public and institutional administrative principals know very well, a necessary piece of in the education system is the change in the teaching and literacy of students would improve including the delivery of creative apparatus for teachers and pupil.
References
Aksal, F. A. (2015). Are headmasters digital leaders in school culture? Education and Science, 40(182), 77-86.
Alan, B., & Mark, W. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6).
Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49-82.
Benedetto, R. (2006). How do independent school leaders build the educational technology leadership capacity of the school? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, United States.
Bernhardt, V. (2015, November). Toward system-wide change. Educational Leadership, 73(3), 56-59.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, 5(3), 235-245.
Blair, N. (2012, January/February). Technology integration for the new 21st-century learner. Principal. 8-13. 93
Cakir, R. (2012). Technology integration and technology leadership in schools as learning organizations. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 273-282.
Campbell, B. (2012). Innovative leadership: Insights from a learning technologist. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(4).
Cator, K. In: Toppo, G. (2011, July 25). Making students literate in a digital age. USA Today.
Denmark, V. (2016). Transformational leadership: A matter of perspective. Retrieved from http://www.advanc-ed.org/source/transformational-leadership-matterperspective 95
Dexter, S., Anderson, R. E., & Ronnkvist, A. (2002). Quality technology support; What is it? Who has it? and What difference does it make? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 287-307.
Eliophotou-Menon, M. (2016). The link between transformational leadership and teachers' job satisfaction, commitment, motivation to learn, and trust in the leader. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 20(3), 12-22.
Eren, E. S. (2011). Technological leadership behavior of elementary school principals in the process of supply and use of educational technologies. Education, 131(3), 625-636.
Fox, M. (2011). Implementing 21st-century skills: A paradox in a traditional world of education? (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest.
Garner, B. (2014). Teaching and learning in the digital age: The rules have changed. The Toolbox: A Teaching and Learning Resource for Instructors. 12(3).
Gay, L. R., & Airasain, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/ quantitative
Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Teacher development. Teacher Development. Retrieved from http://www.ecedu.upatras.gr/services/people/files_publications/ TD/JimoyiannisKomis.pdf.
Kelly, F.S., McCain, T., & Jukes, I. (2009). Teaching the digital generation: No more cookie-cutter high schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B.Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet Safety and America Life Project. Washington, D.C.
Marx, G. (n.d.). Twenty-one trends for the 21st century: Out of the trenches and into the future, their profound implications for students, education, communities, and the whole of society.
Morphew, V. N. (2012). A constructivist approach to the national educational technology standards for teachers. International Society for Technology in Education.
Niekerk, M. V., & Blignaut, S. (2014). A framework for information and communication technology integration in schools through teacher professional development. Africa Education Review, 11(2), 236-253.
Odom, S. F., Jarvis, H. D., Sandlin, M. R., & Peek, C. (2013). Social media tools in the leadership classroom. Journal of Leadership Education, 12(1), 34-53.
Pelgrum, W. J. (2007). IEA SITES International Report: School conditions for pedagogy and ICT: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Pretoria: Unisa Press.
Pelham, B. W. (2013). Intermediate statistics: A conceptual course. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Qualman, E. (2012). Digital leader: 5 simple keys to success and influence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Reeves, D. B. (2009). Leading change in your school: How to conquer myths, build commitment, and get results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Stuart, L.H., Milles, A.M., & Remus, U. (2009). School leaders, ICT competence and championing innovations. Computers & Education, 53(4), 733-741.
Unal, E., Uzun, A. M., & Karatas, S. (2015). An examination of school administrators' technology leadership self-efficacy. Croatian Journal Educational, 17(1), 195- 215. doi:10.15516/cje.v17i1.968
Vallance, M. (2008). Beyond policy: Strategic actions to support ICT integration in Japanese schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 3.
Wang, C. (2010). Technology leadership among school principals: A technologycoordinator’s perspective. Asian Social Science, 6(1), 51-54.
Yu, C., & Durrington, V.A. (2006). Technology standards for school administrators: An analysis of practicing and aspiring administrators’ perceived ability to perform the standards. NASSP Bulletin, 90(4), 301-317.
Zhao, Y. (2009). Catching up or leading the way: American education in the age of globalization. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
