An Integrated Framework for Studying Political Belief System, Tolerance and Participation in Pakistan
Keywords:
Political belief systems, tolerance, participation, framework, SIT, TPB, SJTAbstract
This paper introduces a new integrated framework to analyze the relationships between political belief systems, tolerance, and participation in Pakistan, grounded in Social Identity Theory (SIT), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and System Justification Theory (SJT). It proposes a comprehensive and context-specific tool tailored to Pakistan’s socio-political environment for quantitatively assessing these constructs. The framework incorporates key determinants such as religiosity, political knowledge, political interest, and partisan as well as ideological identification to provide insights into the interplay between belief systems and political behaviour like political tolerance and political participation. With the view to gauge the centrality of the political belief systems, the study used polarized views on various policy choices specific to Pakistani contexts. These issues were identified through a pre-pilot study (N-50) while a pilot study was conducted to test the data collection tool and determine its validity. While the framework lays the foundation for future empirical studies, it does not explore the deeper, formative processes of belief systems. This limitation underscores the need for qualitative research to complement the proposed framework. Future studies may integrate this tool with qualitative approaches to capture the depth and breadth of political behaviours and attitudes in a similar or diverse national and political contexts.
References
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality: Norton.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Arceneaux, K. (2019). The roots of intolerance and opposition to compromise: The effects of absolutism on political attitudes. Personality Individual Differences, 151, 109498.
Baldassarri, D., & Goldberg, A. (2014). Neither ideologues nor agnostics: Alternative voters’ belief system in an age of partisan politics. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 45-95.
Bazurli, R., & Portos, M. (2021). Crook!: The impact of perceived corruption on non-electoral forms of political behaviour. International Political Science Review, 42(2), 245-260.
Blais, A. (Ed.) (2010). Political Participation (Vol. 3): Sage.
Boutyline, A., & Vaisey, S. (2017). Belief network analysis: A relational approach to understanding the structure of attitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 122(5), 1371-1447.
Brandt, M. J. (2022). Measuring the belief system of a person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Brandt, M. J., & Sleegers, W. W. (2021). Evaluating belief system networks as a theory of political belief system dynamics. Personality social psychology review, 25(2), 159-185.
Coenders, M., & Scheepers, P. (2003). The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: An international comparison. Political psychology, 24(2), 313-343.
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of applied social psychology, 28(15), 1429-1464.
Converse, P. E. (Ed.) (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Dalton, R., Van Sickle, A., & Weldon, S. (2010). The individual–institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British journal of political science, 40(1), 51-73.
Dawson, P. A. (1979). The formation and structure of political belief systems. Political Behavior, 1(2), 99-122.
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American's social attitudes become more polarized? American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690-755.
Eisenstein, M. A. (2006). Rethinking the Relationship between Religion and Political Tolerance in the US. Political Behavior, 28(4), 327-348.
Erikson, R. S., & Tedin, K. L. (2019). American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact: Routledge.
Ertan, G., Çarkoğlu, A., & Aytaç, S. E. (2022). Cognitive political networks: A structural approach to measure political polarization in multiparty systems. Social Networks, 68, 118-126.
Fazekas, Z., & Hatemi, P. K. (2021). Narcissism in political participation. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(3), 347-361.
Finkel, S. E., & Opp, K.-D. (1991). Party identification and participation in collective political action. The journal of politics, 53(2), 339-371.
Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A definitional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957-994.
Gherghina, S., & Geissel, B. (2017). Linking democratic preferences and political participation: Evidence from Germany. Political Studies, 65(1S), 24-42.
Gibson, J. L., Claassen, C., & Barceló, J. (2020). Putting groups back into the study of political intolerance. In At the Forefront of Political Psychology (pp. 55-78): Routledge.
Goldberg, A., & Stein, S. K. (2018). Beyond social contagion: Associative diffusion and the emergence of cultural variation. American Sociological Review, 83(5), 897-932.
Hansen, T., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Understanding voters' decisions: A Theory of Planned Behaviour approach. Innovative Marketing, 3(4).
Haqqani, H. (2004). The role of Islam in Pakistan's future. The Washington Quarterly, 28(1), 83-96.
Hazama, Y. (2010). Determinants of political tolerance: A literature review. Studies, 42(3), 437-463.
Hinckley, R. A. (2010). Personality and political tolerance: The limits of democratic learning in postcommunist Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 43(2), 188-207.
Hjerm, M., Eger, M. A., Bohman, A., & Fors Connolly, F. (2020). A new approach to the study of tolerance: Conceptualizing and measuring acceptance, respect, and appreciation of difference. Social Indicators Research, 147(3), 897-919.
Huddy, L., & Bankert, A. (2017). Political partisanship as a social identity. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics.
Jost, J. T. (2020). A theory of system justification: Harvard University Press.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political psychology, 25(6), 881-919.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Sulloway, F. J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2018). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition: Routledge.
Lakoff, G. (2010). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think: University of Chicago Press.
Lavine, H., Lodge, M., & Freitas, K. (2005). Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to information. Political psychology, 26(2), 219-244.
Mangi, S. N., Shah, N., & Ali Soomro, B. (2019). A scientific approach to measure public political participation in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Political Science, 27(1), 88-107.
Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (1999). Group Size, Turnout, and Political Alignments and the Development of US Party Coalitions, 1960–1992. European sociological review, 15(4), 369-389.
Marquart-Pyatt, S., & Paxton, P. (2007). In principle and in practice: Learning political tolerance in Eastern and Western Europe. Political Behavior, 29(1), 89-113.
McKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015). Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 447-473. doi:10.1037/a0038455
Nie, N. H., & Verba, S. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.
Omelicheva, M. Y., & Ahmed, R. (2018). Religion and politics: examining the impact of faith on political participation. Religion, State & Society, 46(1), 4-25.
Peffley, M., & Rohrschneider, R. (2003). Democratization and political tolerance in seventeen countries: A multi-level model of democratic learning. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 243-257.
Peffley, M., Yair, O., & Hutchison, M. L. (2024). Left-Right Social Identity and the Polarization of Political Tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 77(1), 30-44.
Persell, C. H., Green, A., & Gurevich, L. (2001). Civil society, economic distress, and social tolerance. Paper presented at the Sociological forum.
Rafique, Z., Habib, S., & Rosilawati, Y. (2021). Legal, Political and Administrative Barriers to Citizen Participation in Local Governance: An Inquiry of Local Government Institutions. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-13. doi:10.1080/01900692.2021.1993908
Rahim, L. Z. (2013). Muslim secular democracy: Voices from within: Springer.
Rokeach, M. (1968). A theory of organization and change within value-attitude systems. Journal of social issues.
Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320-1340.
Saroglou, V., Clobert, M., Cohen, A. B., Johnson, K. A., Ladd, K. L., Van Pachterbeke, M., . . . Çukur, C. S. (2020). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The cognitive, emotional, moral, and social dimensions of religiousness across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(7-8), 551-575.
Stenner, K. (2005). The Authoritarian Dynamic: Cambridge University Press.
Stouffer, S. A. (1955). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind: Transaction Publishers.
Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1979). An alternative conceptualization of political tolerance: Illusory increases 1950s–1970s. American Political Science Review, 73(3), 781-794.
Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of inter-group differentiation. Differentiation between social groups. In: London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations: Brooks/Cole.
Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J., & Wolf, C. (2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social psychology quarterly, 69(4), 380-390.
Weber, L. (2019). Rugged individuals and social butterflies: the consequences of social and individual political participation for political tolerance. The Social Science Journal, 40(2), 335-342. doi:10.1016/s0362-3319(03)00014-4
Weldon, S. A. (2006). The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 331-349.