Impact of Group Think in Decision Making Process Across Different Professional Groups
Keywords:
Group think, Group work, Decision-making, Professional groupsAbstract
Group think is a well-established phenomenon that has significant implications for decision-making processes within groups. This abstract aims to provide an overview of the research conducted on group think and decision making, using a Bibliometric analysis approach, performance analysis, and utilizing software such as Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). The background section of this study reviews the existing literature on group think and decision making, highlighting its origins, theoretical frameworks, and influential studies. The aim of this research is to explore the trends, patterns, and impact of group think in decision-making contexts. To achieve this objective, a Bibliometric analysis was employed, utilizing Scopus and WoS databases to identify relevant manuscripts. Performance analysis techniques were then applied to assess the impact and influence of the identified manuscripts. The results and findings of the study indicate a substantial body of research on group think and decision making, with a particular focus on its consequences in various domains such as business, politics, and organizational behavior. Co-citation analysis revealed the most influential manuscripts and their connections, providing insights into the key themes and theories in the field. Additionally, the study identified the most cited manuscripts, highlighting the seminal works that have shaped the understanding of group think and decision making. Based on the findings, it can be inferred that group think has far-reaching implications for decision-making processes, often leading to flawed outcomes and poor choices. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of recognizing and mitigating group think tendencies in order to foster more effective decision making within groups. In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of group think and decision making through the application of Bibliometric techniques and performance analysis. The findings underscore the need for awareness and intervention to counter the detrimental effects of group think on decision-making processes.
References
Androniceanu A.,Ristea B. (2014). Decision Making Process in the Decentralized
administration and supervision journal volume 27, number 4.
Asaoka D. (2018). Collective intelligence or group think? Group decision making
Baron, R. S. (2005). So right it’s wrong: Group think and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37(1), 219–253.
Barron, D. N., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Group think: Toward a quantitative measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(2), 158-162.
Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. Wiley.
Bullock III, C. S., & Brady, D. W. (1983). Party, constituency, and roll-call voting in the US Senate. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8(1), 29-43.
Cassell, C. A., & Symon, G. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. Sage.
Century of the Group think Phenomenon.Organizational behavior and human decision processes vol. 73, Nos. 2/3, pp. 163–184, 1998 article no. Ob982760.
Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808-822.
Daren K. et al. (2003).Decision-making in the ICU: perspectives of the substitute
decision-maker. ResearchGate.
Dillon S. (2013). Descriptive Decision Making: Comparing Theory with Practice.
Edubirdie. Retrieved May 21, 2023, from https://edubirdie.com/examples/link-between-groupthink-and-quality-of-decision-making/.
Educational System. ScienceDirect.
Esser, J. K. (1998). Alive and well after 25 years: A review of group think research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2-3), 116-141.+++Esser, J. K., & Lindoerfer, J. S. (1989). Group think and the space shuttle Challenger accident: Toward a quantitative case analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2(3), 167-177.
Fred C. (2010). Group Decision Making: The Potential for Group think. International Journal of management, business and administration.
Fred C. (2010).The decision-making process. National forum of educational
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313-332.
Fuller S., & Aldag R. (1998). Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter
Fulop J. (2013). Introduction to decision making methods. Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 202-239. Group think and presidential power in the post9/11 world. Kennedy proof version.
Harrison E. (2006). A process perspective on strategic decision making. Emerald
Hogg D. (March 22,2013). Application of Group think to Generation Y Decision Making Processes within a Professional Services Context in New Zealand. Canadian Center of science and education.
Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: A new look at the role of cohesiveness in group think. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 323–341.
https://williamwolff.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/griffin-groupthink-challenger.pdf.
informed by both the spent and remaining costs. Communications Biology.
Insight.
Janis, I. (1991). Group think. In E. Griffin (Ed.) A First Look at Communication Theory (pp. 235 - 246). New York: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Group think: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of group think: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1001–1015.
Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7(3), 125-128.
Katopol P. (2015). Group think: Group Dynamics and the Decision-Making Process. Library leadership & Management.
Kelman S. et. al (August 2014)."Tell It Like It Is”: Group think, Decisiveness, and Decision-Making Among U.S. Federal Subcabinet Executives. Harvard Library.
Kennedy B. (January,25,2013).The hijacking of foreign policy decision making:
Kim, Y. (2001). A comparative study of the “Abilene Paradox” and “Group think.” Public Administration Quarterly, 25(2), 168–189.
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009).
Krishnan, V. R. (2001). A note on conflict as an outcome of group decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 575-580.
Link Between Group think and Quality of Decision Making. (2022, September 01).
Liu, C. C., & Srivastava, S. B. (2015). Pulling closer and moving apart: Interaction, identity, and influence in the U.S. Senate, 1973 to 2009. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 192–217.
Lurie N., Mason C. (2007). Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making. Research Gate.
MacDougall, C., & Baum, F. (1997). The devil’s advocate: A strategy to avoid group think and stimulate discussion in focus groups. Qualitative health research, 7(4), 532-541.
Management system.
Manz C.,& Neck C. (1995). Teamthink: beyond the group think syndrome in self-managing work teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
McCauley, C. (1989). The nature of social influence in group think: Complianceand internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 250.
McCauley, C., & Stitt, C. (1978). The impact of group think on decision quality.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(2), 307-328.
Michael W. &Debbie S. (2014). Group think as Communication Process, not Outcome. Hipatia press.
Negulescu O.,Doval E. (2014). The quality of decision making process related to
Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups and organizations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 175-210.
Nicholas H. & Charlotte H. (March 13,2018). Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making. Researchgate publication.
organizational crime: A psychoanalytically informed social psychological perspective Administrative Sciences, 8(3), 24.
organizations’ effectiveness. ScienceDirect.
Packer, D. J. (2009). Avoiding group think: Whereas weakly identified members
Pinsonneault, A., & Heppel, N. (1997). Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(3), 89-108.
Pollock, T. G., & Crouch, R. E. (1988). Effects of group think on strategic decision quality: Effects of group think. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 327-334.
Redish A. et.al (2022). Sunk cost sensitivity during change-of-mind decisions is
remain silent, strongly identified members dissent about collective problems. Psychological Science, 20(5), 546–548.
Rose.D ( 2011). Diverse Perspectives on the Group think Theory – A Literary Review. Emerging Leadership Journeys.
Rovio, E., Eskola, J., Kozub, S. A., Duda, J. L., & Lintunen, T. (2009). Can high group cohesion be harmful? A case study of a junior ice-hockey team. Small Group Research, 40(4), 421–435.
Sassenberg, K., & Postmes, T. (2002). Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence.British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 463.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.
Schruijer, S. (2018). The role of collusive dynamics in the occurrence of
Sharma. P (2011). Decision-Making: Definition, Importance, and Principles Management. Your Article Library.
Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163-193.
Simon H. (1979). Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations. America Snowden D. & Boone M. (2007). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making. Harvard Business Review.
Sujan. January 24, (2021). Decision-Making: Definition, Features, Types, Conditions, and Process Tyonote.Retrieved from https://tyonote.com/decision_making/.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Information (International Social Science Council), 13(2), 65-93.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.
Tsikerdekis, M. (2013). The effects of perceived anonymity and anonymity states on conformity and group think in online communities: A Wikipedia study.
Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1998). Twenty-five years of group think theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2-3), 105-115.
Turner, M. E., Pratkanis, A. R., Probasco, P. W., & Leve, C. (1992). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on group think. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 781-796.
under the japanese companies act. Corporate board.
Whyte, G. (1998). Group think reconsidered. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 392-418.
Williams, R. (2000). Making sense of social research. Sage.
