Linguistic Polarization Through Social Media: A Study of Pakistani Social Media and Politics
Keywords:
ethnic integration, hate speech, PolarizationAbstract
Pakistani society has been deeply impacted by the waves of ethnic integration and national identity from its inception. Traditional societal divisions persist along racial, religious, linguistic, and provincial lines. However societal divisions along political lines have become even more pronounced as a result of political events in the previous decade. Pakistani nationalism and statehood are being eroded by disturbing features of the current tendency toward incorporating violence into our political conduct and cultural practices. Using hate speech to eliminate opponents and incite a wave of rage and violence in Pakistani social media and streets is easier said than done, according to the study. In addition to the already dire state of our society's access to healthcare, education, and jobs, this has further divided and degraded us. A relentless pursuit of power dilutes our nation's principles and character. Using a thematic analysis and a socio-cognitive method, this essay delves into the political speeches of various politicians from Pakistan to uncover the increasing patterns of hate speech and polarization.
References
H., & Akram, H. (2022). An empirical study of Class Point tool application in enhancing EFL students‟ online learning satisfaction. Systems, 10(5), 154.
Akram, H., & Abdelrady, A. H. (2023). Application of Class Point tool in reducing EFL learners‟ test anxiety: empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Computers in Education, 1–19.
Akram, H., Aslam, S., Saleem, A., & Parveen, K. (2021). The challenges of online teaching in COVID19 pandemic: A case study of public universities in Karachi, Pakistan. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 20, 263-282. Akram, H., Yingxiu, Y., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Technology integration in higher education during COVID-19: An assessment of online teaching competencies through technological pedagogical content knowledge model. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 736522.
Al-Tahmazi, T. H. (2015). The pursuit of power in Iraqi political discourse: Unpacking the construction of sociopolitical communities on Facebook. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(2), 163-179. doi:10.1080/17447143.2015.1042383.
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “nasty effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 19(3), 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009
Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098 Ramzan, M., Awan, H. J., Ramzan, M., & Maharvi, H. (2020). Comparative pragmatic study of print media discourse in Baluchistan newspapers headlines. Al-Burz, 12(1), 30-44.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge. Gupta, S. (2021). A Contemporary Analysis of Hate Speech in Political Context. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 2513-2520.
Hassan, A. A. U. ., Fazal, H. ., & Khalid, T. . (2022). Political Hate Speech in Political Processions: A Comparative Analysis of PMLN, PPP and PTI Processions for Election 2018. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 40(2), 1161-1171. Retrieved from http://pjss.bzu.edu.pk/index.php/pjss/article/view/920
Hendriks, C. M., Duus, S., & Ercan, S. A. (2016). Performing politics on social media: the dramaturgy of an environmental controversy on Facebook. Environmental Politics, 25(6), 1102-1125. http://www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1333523681_951.pdf
Kecskés, I. (2014). Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press
Laurita, A. C., & Spreng, R. (2017). The hippocampus and social cognition. In D. E. Hannula & M. C. Duff (Eds.), The Hippocampus from Cells to Systems: Structure, Connectivity, and Functional Contributions to Memory and Flexible Cognition (pp.537-558). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50406-3_17
Lee, Jayeon. (2021). The Effects of Racial Hate Tweets on Perceived Political Polarization and the Roles of Negative Emotions and Individuation. Asian Communication Research. 18. 51-68. 10.20879/acr.2021.18.2.51.
Lee-Won, R. J., Lee, J. Y., Song, H., & Borghetti, L. (2017). “To the bottle, I go... to drain my strain”: Effects of microblogged racist messages on target group members‟ intention to drink alcohol. Communication Research, 44(3), 388-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365021560 7595. 508 Vol. 7 No.1 2024
Marta & Noguera-Vivo, José. (2022). Hate Speech and Polarization in Participatory Society. 10.4324/9781003109891.
Neisser, E. (1994). Hate Speech in the New South Africa: Constitutional Considerations for a Land Recovering from Decades of Racial Repression and Violence. South African Journal on Human Rights, 10(3), 336-356. DOI: 10.1080/02587203.1994.11827544
Niazi, K. H. (2012). The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973. Islamabad. Pérez-Escolar,
Ploger, G. (2019, November 26). Causes and consequences of perceived polarization. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7UTDR
Pronin, E., Puccio, C., & Ross, L. (2002).m Understanding misunderstanding: Social psychological perspectives. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 636-665).
Ramzan, M., Bibi, R., & Khunsa, N. (2023). Unraveling the Link between Social Media Usage and Academic Achievement among ESL Learners: A Quantitative Analysis. Global. Educational Studies Review, VIII, 407-421.
Ramzan, M., Javaid, Z. K., & Fatima, M. (2023). Empowering ESL Students: Harnessing the Potential of Social Media to Enhance Academic Motivation in Higher Education. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI, 224-237. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.
Robinson, R. J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: “Naive realism” in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 404-417. Saleem, D. F. (2021, August 1). Polarization. The News.
Sherman, D. K., Nelson, L. D., & Ross, L. D. (2003). Naïve realism and affirmative action: Adversaries are more similar than they think. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(4), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP 2504_2 Source: https://youtu.be/cIcVBYJvG1M Source: https://youtu.be/qljomULbVgM
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11- 52.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage. van Dijk, T. A. (2005). The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. SAGE Publications.
Zunaira Shafiq. (2021). Discourse of Political Hate Speech on Twitter in Pakistan. Harf-OSukhan, 5(4), 230-245. Retrieved from http://www.harf-o-sukhan.com/index.php/Harf-osukhan/article/view/225
