Exploring Relationship Between Psychological-Capital and Organizational Support in Educational Perspective

Authors

  • Khalid Mahmood PhD Scholar MIU Nerian. Author
  • Dr. Zafar Saleem Assistant Professor MIU Nerian Shareef. Author
  • Uzma Maqbool Elementary School Teacher. Author

Keywords:

Psychological Capital (PsyCap), Organizational Support (OS), Work Engagement (WE)

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between Psychological Capital (PsyCap), Organizational Support (OS), and Work Engagement (WE) among secondary school teachers. Focusing on educators in Mirpur Division, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the research sought to examine whether PsyCap significantly influences WE, with Organizational Support as a potential mediator. A sample of 484 teachers was surveyed, with 57.9% from rural schools, 78% holding Master's degrees, and the majority aged between 31 and 40 years. The findings revealed a significant positive correlation between PsyCap and WE, with a correlation coefficient of 0.514 and a p-value of 0.000. This strong statistical relationship suggests that teachers with higher PsyCap exhibit greater engagement in their work. Furthermore, the analysis of demographic variables—age, teaching experience, and qualifications—revealed no significant differences in PsyCap and WE based on these factors (H03). Regression analysis indicated that approximately 26.4% of the variability in WE can be attributed to PsyCap. Notably, Organizational Support was found to be a partial mediator in the PsyCap-WE relationship. These findings reject the null hypothesis (H01), highlighting the pivotal role of Psychological Capital in enhancing teachers' work engagement. The study’s implications suggest that educational institutions and policymakers should prioritize fostering PsyCap to improve overall teacher engagement and performance. It is recommended that educational institutions invest in developing Psychological Capital (PC) through targeted training and support programs while enhancing Work Engagement (WE) by fostering a supportive and rewarding work culture for teachers.

References

Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., & Kiani, A. (2020). Impact of perceived organizational support on psychological capital: A study in the education sector. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(4), 429-442.

Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., & Saeed, B. B. (2020). Psychological capital as a predictor of employee engagement: A study in the educational sector. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(5), 1033-1046. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2019-0054

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (2001). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51.

Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2013). Transitioning to new lives: The role of psychological capital. Educational Review, 65(2), 221-239.

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.

Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.

Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Developing psychological capital for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 39(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.10.002

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. Vintage.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Social Psychology of Education, 17(3), 407-420.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of the relationship between self-efficacy and burnout in Norwegian teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 17(3), 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9280-5

Snyder, C. R. (2000). Hypothesis: There is no such thing as the "real" self. American Psychologist, 55(1), 56-67.

Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., & Luthans, F. (2016). Hope and psychological capital: Their relation to students' well-being and academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 203-216.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.

Tziner, A., Katan, E., & Shkoler, O. (2021). Psychological capital and resilience: The role of organizational support. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 285-297.

Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2019). Psychological capital: An essential ingredient for a positive workforce. Organizational Dynamics, 48(1), 100723.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Exploring Relationship Between Psychological-Capital and Organizational Support in Educational Perspective. (2024). International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(2), 769-785. http://irjmss.com/index.php/irjmss/article/view/379

Similar Articles

1-10 of 181

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.