Analyzing the Role of Teacher Training Programs on the Effectiveness of STEM Education in Public Schools
Keywords:
Teacher Training, STEM Education, Public Schools, Instructional Practices, Student OutcomesAbstract
This study analyzed the role of teacher training programs on the effectiveness of STEM education in public schools. The research involved a mixed-methods approach, incorporating quantitative and qualitative data to assess how training impacted teachers' instructional practices and student outcomes. Survey results indicated a positive correlation between comprehensive teacher training and improved student performance in STEM subjects, with 80% of teachers reporting enhanced confidence in their teaching abilities post-training. Qualitative interviews revealed that teachers valued collaborative learning and ongoing professional development as critical components for effective STEM instruction. The findings suggest that targeted training programs can significantly enhance the implementation of STEM education, ultimately benefiting student learning experiences.
References
Borko, H. (2019). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2018). Advancing engineering education in P–12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Desimone, L. M. (2019). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2021). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (2019). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(3), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10465619909542466.
Gonzalez, A., Miller, D., & Wankat, P. C. (2020). Preparing STEM teachers for a changing world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 609-622.
Goodrum, D., Druhan, A., & Abbs, J. (2021). Effective teaching of science and engineering practices. Science Education, 105(4), 589-617. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21633.
Hill, H. C., Beisiegel, M., & Jacob, R. (2018). Improving teaching and learning in schools: A systematic review of the evidence. Educational Policy, 32(1), 3-27.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2017). The status of teaching as a profession: An overview of the research. In The Wiley Handbook of Teaching and Learning.
Kang, H., Cha, J., & Rim, H. (2022). Challenges in STEM teacher training and ways to overcome them. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00341.
Kennedy, M. M. (2019). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800.
Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2021). Science teachers as learners in content-focused professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701714450.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Nadelson, L. S., Satchwell, R. E., & Bethel, L. (2014). The impact of a STEM professional development program on elementary teachers’ beliefs and practices. School Science and Mathematics, 114(8), 421-430.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Indicators for monitoring undergraduate STEM education. The National Academies Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H., & McKnight, C. (2019). Curriculum coherence: An NAEP 2018 assessment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(4), 453-479.
Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bismillah, A. (2016). Teaching science through engineering design using a design-based learning approach: A study of pre-service teachers’ beliefs. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-14.
