Usage of Oral Communication Strategies (OCSs) among Pakistani ESL Learners at BS Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/Keywords:
Oral Communication Strategies, ESL, BS LevelAbstract
In Pakistan, English is taught and learned as a second language and continues to play a vital role in higher education, professional communication, and official dealings. Despite studying English for approximately 12–14 years, many ESL learners still demonstrate limited oral communication competence. One possible explanation for this issue is the insufficient use of Oral Communication Strategies (OCSs), defined as verbal and non-verbal techniques employed to overcome communication difficulties arising from limited linguistic competence. The present study investigated the extent to which Pakistani ESL learners employ OCSs and examined eight major categories of these strategies: Social-Affective Strategies, Fluency-Oriented Strategies, Negotiation for Meaning While Speaking, Accuracy-Oriented Strategies, Message Reduction and Alteration Strategies, Non-Verbal Strategies While Speaking, Message Abandonment Strategies, and Attempt-to-Think-in-English Strategies. A total of 1,140 students enrolled in BS and Master's degree programs across ten universities in Pakistan participated in the study. Using a descriptive quantitative research design, data were collected through a self-report survey questionnaire. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Version 20, and measures including mean, median, mode, and standard deviation were calculated. The findings revealed that the overall usage of the 32 selected OCSs fell within the medium utilization category. Furthermore, the eight categories of oral communication strategies were ranked according to their frequency of usage among participants. Based on these findings, recommendations are proposed for language teachers, curriculum planners, material developers, policymakers, and researchers to enhance oral communication competence among Pakistani ESL learners through targeted instruction of oral communication strategies.
References
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of com-municative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Coleman, H. (2010). Teaching and learning in Pakistan: The role of language in education. Islamabad: The British Council.
Ghani, M. (2003). The status and position of English language in Pakistan. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 103-115.
Ghani, M., Mahmood, A., & Akram, M. (2008). Measuring the achievements of English language learners: A study of the learners of Punjab in Pakistan at the secondary level. Language in India, 8 (5). 3
Schofield, P., & Mamuna, G. (2003). The relationship of socio-economic status and length/medium of English instruction with individual differences and English proficiency in Pakistan. Journal of Research, 3, 1-28.
Shamim, F. (2011). English as the language for development in Pakistan: Issues, challenges and possible solutions. Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 291-310).
Jalal, Z. (2004). Language policy in Pakistan. Language Policy, Planning, & Practice: A South Asian Perspective, 23-26.
Mansoor, S. (2003). Language Planning in Higher Education Issues of Access and Equity. Lahore Journal of Economics, 8 (2), 17-40.
Mushtaq, M. (2014). Factor affecting communication of Pakistani students. International Journal of English and Education, 3(1), 278-286.
Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (2), 151-168.

